Pro-choice instead of pro-abortion – what other choice are
they talking about – Coke or Pepsi?
Paper or plastic? Cash or
credit? Nope, the term pro-choice only
refers to one choice, and yet the actual object of choice cannot be mentioned.
African-American instead of Negro or black or whatever – I
had a friend in grade school who was born in South Africa - he was white with
red hair – is he a African-American? How
about an Egyptian or Tunisian? Nope, the
term isn’t accurate but no one seems to care.
Typically, the trouble is that labels often use a word or
two that is not properly defined. I
refer to them as “squishy” words. There
are a few terms that I want no part of, nor do I think they are accurate:
Progressive – in order for this to be an unqualified
positive term, one must have a universally accepted idea of what constitutes
progress.
Environmentalist – We all want the environment to be
preserved, right? Does the environment
ever change, or should we fight to keep it exactly the way it is? Think of the Green Revolution and how it fed
millions while altering the environment in small, benign ways – was that a good
idea or a bad idea. I think the term “conservationist”
is a little bit better. Conserve the
natural world as best we can while making the world better for all of us.
A side note to this term: ever notice that environmentalists
tend to call Earth a “planet” instead of our “world”? Planet seems to make the Earth seem smaller
and more fragile.Diversity – I’m not against people being who or what they are, I just don’t see the advantage of celebrating it. I disagree with the saying “our strength is in our diversity”. Our strength is our ability to unify despite our differences. Even our money says “out of many, one”. That’s “E Pluribus Unum” for the non-Latin scholars out there.
I see a big difference between diversity and individuality. The diversity supporters tend to identify people into diverse groups with social labels. I disagree with this approach. The danger of resorting to stereotypes is too great. Besides, while knowing some general facts about someone may be helpful, I want to judge people as individuals.
I also cringe at the term “cultural diversity”. Only one culture exists in one place at one time. We may wish to label certain aspects of a culture as having their individual existence, but they are really only part of the fabric on the culture as a while.
Activist – Being active in a cause sounds great,
doesn’t it? It depends on what you’re
active in. Most of the people termed as
activists tend to be active in causes that are contrary to the traditional
views of our country and culture. Yes, I’m
saying I support the traditional views of our country and culture. The difference is, I don’t think of myself as
an activist for those positions, rather I stand as an advocate for them.
So now that I’ve made lots of folks upset by my views, I’ll
add one more:
The US is not, and never has been, a democracy. It is a republic comprised of 50 individual
republics. Yes, believe it or not, the
US Constitution says that those entities wishing to be admitted as states must
have a republican (notice I used a small “r”) form of government. One can add adjectives to better define the
type of republic we have, such as “representative” or “constitutional” but we
are indeed a republic.
As a short-hand, the US has been called a democracy, for our
representatives are elected democratically, but those representatives are free
to use their own individual judgment when voting on how best to govern. DeToqueville’s work Democracy
in America says it best.